Sovereign England and UK Debt

Financial Debt Left by the UK

It is July 2021 and The Party is making an assessment on how the sovereign country of England will act in regards to UK debt. Firstly, we need to make a distinction between authentic debt accrued through the sale of UK government bonds to buyers who expect to cash in their credit once the bonds have matured, and unsubstantiated debt. Concerning the latter, we need to take into account that, during the period of the ex-UK, England did not have a parliament or any form of popular representation at national level, whereas Scotland and Wales each have their own elected parliament and Northern Ireland has the equivalent going by the name of Assembly. 

This means that a substantial part of the UK national debt was made when England, alone among all nations of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, had no elected public representation, contrary to the other three nations, and therefore no devolved legislature. The future elected parliament of Sovereign England cannot take responsibility for UK public debt that has been made without due process. One such case is the so-called divorce bill worked out by Theresa May and signed by Boris Johnson, the modern version of the Versailles Treaty which totally bankrupted Germany after the First World War.

The EU’s Divorce Bill

At the time in which Boris Johnson signed this peculiar piece of paper obliging Britain and Northern Ireland to hand over £39 billion to the European Union, he did so on the stated grounds that the UK had been married to the EU and, on separating, had to pay this sum of money over to the EU Commissariat in Brussels. The truth is, however, England was part of a union with three other nations, namely Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, thus making void any claim to a successive “marriage” with Europe. 

Furthermore, the request for £39 billion to be paid by way of instalments, intended to end somewhere in 2067, came about through undue influence on the part of unelected commissars of the European Union who had been threatening to use trade as a weapon to punish Britain and Northern Ireland unless this money was handed over.

The following is a word-for-word reprint from the first part of a Party publication dated early 2017:

From England

Anglia Of England

@angliaofengland a few seconds ago (2017)

Today’s page comes from England, land of the English Folk. Being a country without a sovereign parliament, we are currently witnessing people sitting in Westminster arguing over a Brexit deal where MPs who swore allegiance to a private family are arguing over how to deal with their overlords of the foreign EU Commission. They say they want to regain sovereignty from the EU, but that is because in Westminster they already handed over sovereignty to the EU commissars years ago.

President Trump says Theresa May should sue the EU rather than negotiate, however until recently the EU was demanding £100 billion of the UK treasury in order that Britain be allowed to leave an organization no-one in Britain ever voted to join. Theresa May then offered to hand over £40 billion to the EU commissars, money that does not exist. The UK treasury is bankrupt with over £2 trillion of public debt.

Would this money go to the EU commissars, or to the treasuries of foreign countries? Who would pay this money? Only one person gave ‘royal assent’ to join the EU, and that person, to whom Westminster swears an oath of allegiance, is also identified as ‘head of the treasury’.

So she can pay up? I won’t! England has no parliament. Only The Party campaigns for an elected sovereign English parliament.

End of script.

Weaponising Trade

Following the June 2016 referendum on European Union membership, as we can see from the 2017 edition, the EU commissars illegally demanded £100 billion, or euro, from Britain and Northern Ireland in return for trading rights with a substantial part of Europe, even though in the referendum no-one voted on paying or not paying any money to the EU. It was never up for discussion on the ballot sheet. The EU later reduced the demand for money to £39 billion, but in return a whole series of demands had to be met, including handing over fishing rights in English waters to the European Union. 

Aside from that, Theresa May, and later Boris Johnson, continued handing over each day around £50 million to the EU, years after the 2016 referendum, and much of this was placed on the public debt. The fact is, England will not pay these debts made illegally by a person – Theresa May – and a group of people – the majority of MPs and lords in the UK parliament – who were in favour of Britain remaining in the EU and did their utmost to sabotage the outcome of the referendum, including using UK courts to impose sentences that prevented Britain activating the referendum’s result.

Indeed, a future English parliament will need to initiate talks for a fair and reciprocal trade agreement with countries of El Continente, starting with Mexico, and refuse to pay undue bills to European countries who tried crippling England with the aid of treasonous MPs and peers of the UK parliament. England did not have a parliament at the time the “divorce bill” of Theresa May was signed by Boris Johnson, and England was never married to Europe.

The Party has decided to include a link to a music theme, following Captain Merryca’s example after he went and discovered Mexico back in 2018. Here is the link.

England’s Future Trade Agreement

Sovereign England will not be subdued by bullies, and Anglia, also known as Mädel, has an agreement con El Santo Padre de México, as reported in one of our previous editions, here the link. She works at the English Chancellery and is our expert on economics. She will not entertain relations with the EU! The Gulf Stream comes from Mexico, it brings a temperate climate to England, embracing our shores and giving us prosperity. From Europe we get the Beast from the East, illegal demands for money that future English generations are supposed to pay, the Versailles Treaty, and now we are also getting tens of thousands of people who migrated illegally to Europe and are being illegally transported into English waters by warships of the European Union, in blatant contravention of international laws.

The EU is trying to cripple England, probably in the hope that the English will surrender and creep to the people who Boris Johnson’s family made a public show of voting for. Boris Johnson’s father needs to understand that the decisions he makes for Boris are of public interest when these relate to national decisions at ‘government’ level. One example is his decision to tell Boris to sign up to closer relationships with Communist China, as mentioned here in this link at The Party. It is time that the English make democratic decisions on the future of England, and for this we need a sovereign, elected parliament.

England’s Ecclesiastic Sovereignty

England’s Church is not what the ex-UK claims, but as upheld at The Party.

The following is a 2017 script written at the English Chancellery giving an impression of the conversation that took place when the pope sent his ambassador to the kingdom of Kent:

In the sixth century, the pope sent his envoy with a papal bag containing missions to be accomplished. The King and Queen introduced Augustine to the building dedicated to Saint Martin of Tours, in Canterbury the capital of Kent, which was already in function as a church before the papal envoy’s arrival.

Augustine exclaimed: “You founded this church?”

And King Ethelbert replied: “Yes, lad, long before you got here, after all, I’m the king!”

To which Augustine answered: “Well the holy father in Rome said he …”

“Nonsense!”, interrupted the King of Kent, “The Holy Father is in Heaven and He sent my wife Bertha to my Kentish kingdom here in Britain with the Gospel.”