Boris Johnson’s UK Dynasty

UK’s Integrated Review on future foreign policy was promoted by Boris Johnson’s father and George Osborne.

A Dynastic Family’s New World Order

Today’s edition at The Party is investigating how a group of people in the Westminster corridors of power, with connections both to the former UK and the EU, placed all their hopes concerning a new world order into the office of one person: that of Boris Johnson, resident in 10 Downing Street and holder of the office of “UK” prime minister. According to reports that have been circulating in the press and on TV, he has to all effect set up a dynasty dealing in national and world affairs which is being run at family level and with the support of people who are not even elected.

Boris Johnson’s Ideological Coup

What we know is that Boris Johnson became prime minister of the UK in July 2019 and that his first and foremost declared mission was to carry out Brexit, referring to the referendum held in June 2016 where a majority of people voted for Great Britain and Northern Ireland to leave the EU. Although numerous politicians at the time claimed that 52% was not a majority and that the referendum result should be overruled while others were too ambiguous for people to understand what they were talking about in regards to the referendum result, it was generally accepted that Mr Johnson would put an end to the three years of treasonous back-and-forth carried out by Theresa May from the day of the referendum to the day she resigned.

What many people didn’t expect, however, was Boris’ subsequent ideological declarations of fantastical projects for Britain, with forty new hospitals being promised, along with 25,000 new nurses – that at the time were supposed to be imported from India and the Philippines – along with a plan for a high-speed railway track that is very unpopular among the people whose counties it is supposed to cut through, and vague references to a powerhouse of the north that was meant to spring up in Yorkshire, along with some other plans, including a bridge, or possibly a tunnel, from Scotland to Ireland and the promise that Britain’s steel industry would be up and running again once it was bought up by foreign investors. Indeed, these promises resembled a coup d’etat, to the point that the newly appointed chancellor of the exchequer, Sajid Javid, had to immediately resign along with all his advisers for questioning where so much money would come from in order to fund all these projects. It was clear at the time that not even all the tea in China would be enough to extinguish even half of Britain’s public debt, and Boris never made any reference to this, but instead only talked about new projects that would cost hundreds and hundreds of billions of pounds – and perhaps hundreds of billions more.

Belt and Road From China

In July 2019, most common people in Britain were so fed up with the EU farce and with hearing about an Irish backstop, and whether it should be along a hard and visible land border or at the bottom of the sea where no-one can see it, and of hearing about a deal or no-deal with Europe, that little did they realise what was going on behind the scenes in 10 Downing Street. Boris Johnson’s master plan was a hidden card which he had inherited from the previous governments of David Cameron and Theresa May, something akin to an Illuminati code from a secret lodge of which he had become the grand master. It was all about embarking on a massive sale of British assets to Communist China to fund the bankrupt UK economy and also its treasury. And it was now up to Mr Johnson to deal the striking blow, which is where all the bluster and glitter was leading to. Only, as if trumped by a superior force, the entire plan was put on hold by the Covid-19 pandemic which appeared within a few months of Mr Johnson taking office.

United States Intervention

In a previous edition – here the link – we have seen that in July 2020, the US Secretary of State came to Britain and forced Boris Johnson to disclaim any idea of Chinese participation in British 5G telecommunications and to subscribe to replacing all Chinese components in the older telecommunication apparatus. Towards the end of the same year the pandemic peaked a second time, forcing the continuation of the lockdown that had been in place in Britain since around March-April 2020. It was not until March 2021 that the discussions on relations with Communist China flared up again in City circles, with numerous Tory MPs demanding clarification on 10 Downing Street’s stance on the issue. By this time, Boris Johnson’s chief adviser and all his other advisers had been sacked, somewhere around Christmas 2020, and we eventually began to learn that Boris’ family members were now running the scene in Downing Street. It was a family dynasty in the making, cemented by a handful of old cronies from past Tory governments. 

In March 2021, the Daily Mail reported:

“PMs father Stanley wades into China row by urging Boris Johnson to ‘stand up’ to Tory hawks accused of ‘cooking up new cold war’ with Beijing – saying post-Brexit UK must work ‘even closer’ with communist state.”

• Stanley Johnson rubbished Tory demands the UK should be ‘tougher’ towards China

• Boris Johnson sparked party civil war over foreign and defence policy last week

• Security chiefs called China a 'generational threat' to western governments

Here is the link to the March 2021 Daily Mail article.

Secret Service Awoke to Communist Threat

While the British secret services were stating that the Tory government policy towards Communist China was a threat protracted into the future to the detriment of generations of people – and in so saying they were concurring with the line taken by the United States of America, Boris Johnson was following the line taken by his father who was calling for Westminster to collaborate even more closely with the Chinese Communist party and for Boris to oppose anyone who chose to stand up and call for an end of the Communist takeover. While we are not aware that Mr Johnson the elder is an elected representative in public office, we can estimate that his rubbishing off of other people’s views while dictating the state agenda to Boris Johnson is a clear manifestation of tyranny towards a public office and is in blatant defiance of democracy. His action is a stab in the heart of democracy while dragging England, and indeed all Britain, into the embrace of foreign Communism.

The Daily Mail article goes on to clarify:

"His (Johnson senior’s) intervention comes amid a raging Tory revolt over the Government’s strategy for relations with China after its Integrated Review was published last week. The security document takes a much softer tone on China than with Russia, saying that although it is an ‘authoritarian state’ it will be ‘an increasingly important partner’. The Integrated Review states: ‘We will continue to pursue a positive economic relationship, including deeper trade links and more Chinese investment in the UK.’”

The “UK’s” official Integrated Review defining presumed government policy for the future had been published in that same month of March 2021 and was at the base of the controversy that saw Boris Johnson’s father asserting his authority. That Review outlines Boris Johnson’s intention to bring about deeper trade links with Communist China and attract even more Chinese investments through the further sale of British assets to the Chinese Communist state. In fact we may assume that this “UK” policy called the Integrated Review was written by Boris Johnson’s father and, as we shall later see, George Osborne, and given to Boris (an inept puppet) to sign off. And this would explain why he needed the intervention of his father – and of Osborne – to defend him from all Tory MPs disagreeing with it and from the MI6. The Integrated Review of March 2021 is the exact opposite of the policy presented by the United States of America at the June 2021 G7 summit in England three months later, demonstrating just how completely wrong the puppet Boris got it.

Communist UK’s Golden Era – the Future Is With Stalin and Mao

And here we have the intervention of former Tory chancellor George Osborne, who, while no longer an elected member of public office, made sure the Integrated Review was pushed through into official policy with no tolerance for objections, as described in the Daily Mail’s March 2021 print:

“However, former Chancellor George Osborne hit back at Tory hawks as he praised the Prime Minister for ‘seeing off the hotheads’ who he claimed want to start a 'new Cold War' with the Chinese government. The former Evening Standard editor said he sees ‘a lot of continuity’ between the new strategy for relations with China and the ‘golden era’ approach he took when he was in power with David Cameron.”

This sums it all up: George Osborne sees in Boris Johnson and his family dictatorship the natural continuation of at least a decade of Tory party policy of submission and sell-out to Communist China, which he calls a ‘golden era’. Calling people expressing a different view on this agenda ‘hotheads’ is just a straw away from a foreign Communist politburo stamping out as dissenters anyone who opposes their agenda. Indeed, we may ask: where is democracy in the “UK’s” Integrated Review? Did people democratically sign up to this? Was it ever in Boris Johnson’s electoral campaign for the Tory party? Did he or Theresa May specifically state in 2019, during the Conservative party’s election campaign, that Britain’s assets would be systematically sold out to Communist China in order to fund the grandiose and often unwanted construction programmes that Boris was claiming he’d achieve? Could it be that certain projects, such as the high-speed railway in England that so many people do not want, are meant to benefit only Chinese interests and not England’s at all?

But then, would the City establishment and Whitehall tell the people that they need Communist China in order to prevent the City being declared bankrupt by a legal tribunal with all the financial consequences – including at personal level – for those who operated the scene? And would they tell the people that by selling Britain’s bankrupt economy to a foreign Communist state, they would be assuring themselves not only immunity to bankruptcy, but a further helping of top salaries and even bigger bonuses way out into the future?

In our upcoming edition, we will be presenting a reprint of a September 2018 publication that disappeared when all Disqus channels were taken down one year later. It presents The Party’s view on trade policy towards China as it was already expressed back then and is proof that The party was the only voice in England standing up to the Conservative government’s betrayal as it tried selling out England to a foreign Communist state.