Deutschlands Ostfront-Regierung

Berlin’s latest governing coalition has received marching orders to the east and it’s trying to take England and Scotland down with it – or someone else is!

The Nuclear Holocaust Scenario

Since the beginning of May 2025, Germany has a new government, and it appears this regime is playing dangerous games with the national security of both Scotland and England.

Currently there is no guarantee by way of a British military strategy to use nuclear weapons to defend another country, thus giving the somewhat safer impression that an atomic war elsewhere would not automatically extend to the British Isles.

Yet the government in Berlin has been floating the idea of a nuclear umbrella that obliges England and Scotland to commit by default to a nuclear first strike on behalf of X country or countries in NATO – without giving any specifications to which.

On a Rainy Day

First and foremost, considering the sheer nature of such an event and the scale of mass destruction it would cause to the country targeted, and taking also into account the effects of a potential nuclear retaliation against the island of Britain following a nuclear strike, it’s hard to grasp that a foreign government would even contemplate this strategy without first publicly consulting at democratic level with the island’s inhabitants.

Even the idea that a national government in London or in Edinburgh would just sign a white paper outlining the intention to bring their country into a guaranteed nuclear-holocaust strategy for a foreign belligerent is absurd, let alone a foreign government advancing the idea.

And for those who believe in the rule of the few, even the notion that such a decision could be reached at a cabinet meeting comprising of four or five men seated around a table one rainy afternoon and behind closed doors, is equally repugnant.

Democratic Consent

The very essence of democracy when it was founded in Athens thousands of years ago was to prevent precisely that which a German chancellor intends doing, namely the enforcement of tyranny over society in a way that people cannot object and generally have no say in whichever decisions are being taken.

Accustomed to the EU bullying strategy that Berlin and other European capitals excelled in, including illegally extorting four years of extra net contributions from Britain following the Leave the EU referendum of 2016 along with a further 39 billion pounds*, Germany’s government doesn’t seem to have realised that not only is the Tory party no longer in power, but Labour too is about to go through the door.

*This sum corresponded to 50 billion euros, although originally the EU commissar of the time had demanded 100 billion euros.

Here is today’s Party musical theme.

Berlin’s Current Bad Reputation

A Hunnic proverb says: An ox never decides where it’s going, the person sitting on the cart whipping it does.

The English and the Scots don’t know whose agenda the German chancellor is pulling along on a cart, especially when they discover that his party got voted into parliament partly on a promise not to break the German constitutional law regulating public debt. Yet on entering the Bundestag following the February 2025 general election, his party immediately broke that promise and decided to lead Germany along a road of self-destructive public borrowing with the aim of dragging the country into overt preparation for war.

Germany not having been militarily threatened, one need ask oneself why this country is being force-marched into conflict and which foreign NATO governments are behind it, for it does not appear that the majority of Germans actually voted for this.

Then we have the case of a populist party that missed the five percent hurdle to enter the Bundestag by a mere 0.02 percent and saw its legitimate request for a recount of the vote turned down by the State. Had this party obtained the five percent minimum required to enter parliament following a recount of the vote, the current governing coalition’s eight seat majority would not stand and the chancellor would not necessarily be in office.

No Fire, No Smoke

So yes, it would be easier for England and Scotland to demand a recount of Germany’s Feb ‘25 election before even bothering discussing and voting upon a nuclear umbrella for X unspecified country or countries of NATO at the request of someone who, for all the English and the Scots know, could be a tyrant working for a third party which isn’t even Germany.

What’s more, if the inhabitants of the island of Britain were to have a democratic referendum on whether to adopt a nuclear umbrella for some other NATO state outside of Germany, they might also want to have a say in how such country is governed to make sure they don’t end up at war in the first place.

Just think: a permanent council at Hadrian’s Wall where folks from both sides of the border make binding decisions over some eastern European countries: monitoring, approving or denying policies that could be deemed reckless and conductive to war. Either that, or they simply vote NO to the proposal of extending an atomic umbrella. In this regard, I expect to see a referendum taking place if and when the German government’s nuclear proposal is presented to Edinburgh or London.

No National Mandate for War

Finally, I don’t believe the English are prepared to go to war at all for eastern Europe as the opinion polls are suggesting a new party has become the most popular. Were there to be a general election tomorrow, this populist party would sweep into government in London with an overwhelming majority. And I don’t have the impression there’s an intention on their part of going into World War Three without a public mandate on the matter.

In my opinion it’s more likely the English will launch an inquiry into how foreign governments and EU commissars ripped off tens of billions of pounds of England’s money following the EU referendum and whether it was legal or illegal. One question comes inevitably to the fore: who was Boris Johnson and his party really working for?