Die Befreiung Deutschlands von Europa

Fremdherrschaft hat keinen Platz in Deutschland und das deutsche Volk soll nicht für einen Vernichtungskrieg in Europa aufgeopfert werden.

Along the Road From England to Germany

In the recent 13th May 2025 publication Deutschlands Ostfront-Regierung, it’s written: ‘Berlin’s latest governing coalition has received marching orders to the east and it’s trying to take England and Scotland down with it – or someone else is’.

Knowing in 2022 that the British establishment’s days were numbered and that within time a new party will get round to governing in England, I sent Freundin on to free German Land from European domination. By this time EU commissars and foreign governments were losing their grip over English affairs, these not being within their prerogative to mess up, so now it was the case of liberating Germany from foreign rule.

While at this point in time the country is being dragged by foreign European NATO governments into preparations for a world war against Russia, Mädel is working along the Hun’s specific guidelines to prevent alien actors from sacrificing Germany to a foreign world war. In 2022 I told her: The old Adenauer establishment has to go. And go it will!

Here is today’s Party musical presentation.

Outdated Versus Updated Government

As it stands now, in England both Labour and the Tory party are still running entire tiers of local government on an outdated electoral mandate, for they know that an election today would see them through the door. Equally, Westminster is run by a government that, according to the opinion polls, does not have the corresponding democratic support of the electorate – the same as in Germany where the present coalition would not hold if a general election were held now.

However, in the ten county councils where, on the 1st May 2025, a populist party received the mandate to form a majority government, the writing is on the wall: flags of a nature not pertaining to English county government have been taken down from the administrative premises.

Following this logic, we can assume that once this party has been elected to form a majority government in Westminster, all the British soldiers, pilots and sailors stationed around eastern Europe in preparation for World War Three will be recalled home because they simply don’t belong there.

If there had been a popular vote to fight a third world war for one or more NATO countries in eastern Europe, perhaps their presence could be explained along democratic lines, but this not being the case, we must assume that foreign NATO governments in Europe are making decisions over England’s affairs to which they have no right.

A Trojan Horse

In the above-linked article we have seen that Berlin’s chancellor was already drawing up battle plans to infiltrate Britain with a disguise stratagem: under the guise of planning a British nuclear umbrella extended to Germany, he was in fact pulling another NATO country’s cart on behalf of whom this umbrella should be used, to all effect acting as the medium for a third country whose wooden horse he was dragging along.

Here the case was made that the English and the Scots had no say in either escalatory or de-escalatory policies of one or more NATO countries on whose behalf Berlin’s coalition is compromising German national security, hence the declaration of intent to willy-nilly gatecrash the island of Britain with a nuclear programme of holocaustian proportions as if Britain had to take orders from the EU Commissariat is, to put it bluntly, a hostile action.

In the 13th May ‘25 post I made clear that the Bundestag would need to bring the case to the attention of England and Scotland specifying which NATO country or countries this nuclear umbrella is supposed to be a guarantor for and why they are involving Germany in war preparations when the country itself has not been militarily threatened.

Using the notion of democracy as a basis, the Hun opined that the citizenry on the western side of the German Ocean would need to democratically consult and decide per referendum whether they are prepared to sacrifice others and consequently be sacrificed to a nuclear holocaust for European NATO countries over whose policies they have no say.

Pre-empting Foreign Bullying

If Mädel succeeds in prising Germany away from European domination as I expect her to, then it should be done in a way that a non-elected commissariat cannot ask for the payment of a penalty for leaving. To this end the legality of such a demand and its consequences should be investigated, and this includes Theresa May’s threat to cancel Britain’s 2016 referendum result unless foreign terms and conditions randomly invented ad hoc were adhered to.

Firstly, no referendum to join the European Union had ever been held in England in the first place, and the same applies to Germany. Secondly, there was no regulation stipulating that 100 billion euros had to be paid to the EU as a quit penalty, and the fact that this was reduced to 50 billion euros, or 39 billion pounds, is indicative of the non existence of any leave fee whatsoever, meaning the figure had been invented by an EU commissar in 2016 and lacked legal validity in every sense of the wording.

The threat by a British PM to cancel the referendum’s result is proof of the bullying nature applied in order to extort a large sum of money and I wouldn’t be surprised if a request is one day made for the repayment of that sum plus the restitution of four years of extra net contributions* paid following the referendum.

The refusal of the Tory party to implement Brexit at the time was planned in a way that the same party had to be voted back into government in the person of Boris Johnson in order to get done what they were supposed to do in 2016 without further ado.

*All the money Britain paid on expenses to the EU above the amount Britain received from the EU following the referendum.

Gewarnt ist gewappnet - Forewarned Is Forearmed

With the benefit of hindsight, in Germany’s case it would be necessary in the event of a decision to quit the European Union to immediately present a legal criminal case denouncing attempted extortion against any country whose government or appointed citizen acting as an EU official demands a ransom payment for leaving the EU.

In conclusion, the Brexit debacle should be studied as a blueprint on how to forestall all attempts of foreign governments and foreign citizens appointed as EU officials to postpone, delay and financially penalise the country’s exit from the European Empire once a democratic decision is made to leave.

In the meantime, the Bundestag needs to explain to the electorate why 20 billion euros of public funds are being handed over every year to the EU in the form of net contributions that do not come back, and why Germany is being dragged into preparations for a world war to appease some other EU countries whose policies and decisions are beyond the scrutiny and veto of the German nation and as such cannot be attributed as Germany’s responsibility.