There Is No Plan Z

Defending against the rhetoric of the second Churchill and the second Stalin is an essential requirement for the Ukrainian Child to be successful.

Ukraine Must Not Fall

The Serbian Mother never had a plan Z, her last and most final alliance being with the spiritual Mother of All the Rus nations.

Italy and Germany both having solemnly renounced all and any interest in their respective national Churches – which in the latter instance also spelled goodbye to Switzerland *, this left the Ukrainian Child of the One Mother of the Rus family of nations. After that there is no other plan.

This means: if Ukraine fell, it’s over, and what happens then I don’t know. Russia will have gone down the road that a state-to-nowhere took when some individual people reinvented themselves as ‘a people’ and betrayed the Serbian Mother and Child on behalf of the EU godfathers who purchased them.

*For all of which brother Hun takes not one shred of responsibility.

Not Saving, but Sacrificing Ukraine

Following up on Boris Johnson’s July 2024 declaration where he promotes the Kremlin’s ‘denazification’ programme while claiming his personally-approved candidate for US President will ‘save Ukraine’, we shall be looking at what the aspiring Whitehouse leader has to offer.

Once again for the record, the July memorandum states that after the Ukrainian army will have launched an all out self-destructive military campaign to the east and the south against the Russian trenches and bunkers, there would have to be a cession of Ukrainian lands to the Kremlin and the return of Russia to the G8, specifically of its tsar who changed Russia’s constitution to be forever in power and to expand Russia’s borders.

Not less critically, he states that the Muscovite president-forever should be entitled to say he ‘denazified Ukraine’. Considering what Boris Johnson – who described himself as the second Winston Churchill – thinks of ‘Nazis’, we know what he really thinks of Ukrainians, whose army he simply wants to sacrifice on the battlefield.

The Bitter Reality

In the month of September 2024, the world got to know more precisely what this US candidate, promoted by former 10 Downing Street occupants, thinks of Ukraine. He said: “If they (had) made a bad deal, it would have been much better, they would have given up a little bit …”

He went on to say: “What deal can we make? The people are dead, the country is in rubble.”

We can see that Boris Johnson’s candidate has already declared the Ukrainians as dead and their country as gone. And the day prior, he had glorified the actions of the Russian State and its predecessor the Soviet Union with the words “wars are what they do”.

Green Lights of Glorification

At the Kremlin, these kinds of speeches have been interpreted as a green light for the continued invasion and occupation of Kyiv’s sovereign territory, for they offer the prospect of international treaties consolidating the conquests with altered boundaries, the de-facto permanent expulsion of many people from their indigenous homelands, and the embrace at the next G8 reunion where Muscovy tycoons would also appear in a flotilla of ‘yachts’ ready to sign cheques for very expensive luxury assets as part of their status symbol portfolio.

The prospect is that millions and millions more people would be made to permanently resettle in the West, their children being told at school to ‘stop speaking Ukrainian!’

Another Throw of the Dice

The question arises as to why Boris Johnson is telling the Ukrainians to go launch their army in a devastating self-elimination attack on Red Army minefields and against formidable bunker emplacements all the way to Donetsk and to Crimea when the Russians should actually be standing with Ukraine on the same side.

Clearly he decided to have one more go, but it’s his last throw of the dice, because if he succeeds this time too, it’s the end, there not being a plan Z. The one logical result is that it’s either him who succeeds, or the Ukrainian Child. And this leaves brother Hun examining his next options on what to write here on Party space relevant to the Kremlin who the second Winston Churchill is trying to save.

Yes, let there be no misinterpretation here: his candidate for the US presidency is not out to ‘save Ukraine’, but to save the Kremlin and its tsar, and the former 10 Downing Street resident promoting him has been lying and trying to sacrifice Ukraine’s army on the battlefield.

Operation Barbarossa 2

If Ukraine gave in to Boris Johnson’s proclamation, ceded territory to the Muscovia and then joined the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, the Kremlin, while once again dealing in lucrative carbon-related trade with the EU and cashing in hard currency, would start replenishing its arsenals on the grounds that NATO is planning another Operation Barbarossa from a smaller Ukraine.

This time, the propaganda directed at the population in Russia could strike a nerve, seeing that recent history in Russia is taught along the lines of Stalin’s version and Churchill’s too. Whereas currently the Russians know that the so-called ‘special military operation’ is not at all against NATO or National Socialism but against a Cossack nation of Rus kin – reason for which Moscow is terrified to call a general mobilization, being at war against ‘a Nazi NATO ready to strike Russia from Ukraine’ could to the contrary evoke a mass hysteria with many millions of men lining up ready to mobilise and wipe Ukraine off the map.

Operation Barbarossa 1: What Happened in 1941?

In order to better understand the mortal nature of the trap that joining the North Atlantic Treaty Organization would imply for the Ukrainians, and how an allied counter-offensive against Russia to ward off a future attack against Ukraine would be twisted around into ‘a NATO aggression against Russia’, we need to look at the basic outline of events that unfolded both prior to and at the time of the first phase of the German offensive against the Red Army in 1941.

Firstly, contrary to the accepted propaganda imposed by Stalin and Churchill, Germany’s military campaign into Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia was not an invasion of the USSR. These three countries were not part of that empire, they had been invaded and occupied a year earlier by the Soviet Union and illegally annexed.

More than fifty-nine thousand Estonians were either executed or deported to gulags – where many succumbed later to the horrors of torture, over 34,000 Latvians encountered the same fate, and seventy-five thousand Lithuanians. Mass genocide was in progress, and when the German army started entering these countries in June 1941, Stalin had already given the order for the liquidation of another one hundred and fifty thousand people that would have taken place just days later.

These people were saved by the Germans, because so soon as the campaign started, many young men who had been force-recruited into the Red Army in the three Baltic countries deserted in mass and started rounding up Soviet military forces instead of having to watch their own kind being deported to certain death. According to one Lithuanian official, there was even an order from Stalin and Molotov to round up as many as 700,000 Lithuanians.

Stalinist Propaganda Says Otherwise

And yet, according to official history, ‘the Nazis invaded the Soviet Union and set about mass-murdering people’. This is what Russians are taught, and we can assume with certainty that the same would happen again if a reduced Ukraine joined NATO, got invaded again and NATO counter-attacked. As happened to Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania in 1940, any part of occupied Ukraine would be called ‘a part of Russia’, and the Muscovite propaganda would sound like this: ‘Nazi NATO just invaded Russia!’.

Indeed, saying then that ‘NATO invaded Russia’ during an attempt to get back Ukraine from the Kremlin’s invasion and occupation, would be the exact same as stating ‘Germany invaded the USSR’ when Operation Barbarossa was launched to free the Baltic countries from occupation, mass executions, deportations and ultimately from genocide.

The Onus Is on Russia to Vacate Ukrainian Soil

A better card in the hand of Ukraine is to make clear that Moscow invaded a brother nation that is not a member of NATO and that the Russians are obliged to put an end to this forthwith. The Kremlin is at War against the spiritual Mother of the Rus family and is trying its utmost to bully what is left of Ukraine into joining NATO to then prepare the next attack.

The people the Kremlin deals with are the likes of Boris Johnson, the City financiers and the oil companies, accompanied by a fleet of tycoons in their yachts buying up London and other western luxury resorts. Their plan is to permanently expel possibly tens of millions of Ukrainians from their own Motherland and then get back to business as usual with the West. All they need are the appropriate people in power in the West to deal with.

Here is today’s Party song.

The ‘Secret Protocol’ … What?

According to an unsubstantiated claim void of original and verifiable documents, the German and Soviet governments made a secret agreement whereby Stalin was asked by the National Socialists to invade Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Finland and Romania. In the Hun’s eyes, this claim has as much value as the one whereby Germany had planned to conquer the United States of America and call it ‘New Spain’, another invention of Bletchley Park.

In reality, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania by way of their governments signed treaties with the USSR on the 28 September 1939, the 5 October 1939 and the 10 October 1939 respectively, each country allowing tens of thousands of Red Army troops onto their territory.

Nine months later, in June 1940, it would be these garrisons that took over and caused the occupation of the three countries on the eastern coast of the Baltic Sea, similar as Russian soldiers based in Sevastopol in Crimean Ukraine would one day march out and illegally annex Crimea to Russia.

The fact of the matter concerning the Baltic countries is that Winston Churchill signed them over to Stalin and the USSR during one of his meetings with the Soviets, either in Moscow or in Yalta.

Stalin probably said: Thank you, comrade Churchill, and he would have replied: You’re welcome, buddy Stalin!

We might as well ask ourselves who really gave Stalin 'permission' to invade these three countries in June 1940 just as the British army was quickly evacuating from Dunkirk and from Norway. One guess!