From English to Rus: A Church Is Not for Sale

From the verb to sijel – sijeliti, and yet a spiritual Mother’s Church is not meant to be sold.

The English

Following up on previous Party pages, we have seen that both the English Church, founded over one thousand four hundred years ago, and the Rus Church, that sprang to life over one thousand years ago, have been the object of cancellation attempts imposed by the established authorities.

The British Establishment went out of their way to declare Angela’s presentation of the original English foundation as null and void because it challenged the position of their monarch who claims to be the supreme commander and the head of an institution founded by brute force in the first half of the sixteenth century, over nine hundred years later.

My sister had publicly stated that, as the English Law considers the head of the Church in England the rightful monarch, Jesus Son of God therefore is according to English Law the rightful King of England, he being the sole head of the ecclesiastic Assembly. The point she made was that Henry VIII tried cancelling out of existence almost one thousand years of church history and invented a new foundation with himself as its spiritual and temporal head.

The Rus

Although the details are different, the Rus Church too was subject to a cancellation attempt in the second half of the seventeenth century when a pope in Istanbul claimed, along the lines of Henry VIII in England, to have the spiritual authority to cancel its identity and exchange the original foundation for a new authority under the control of Tsar Peter, a fourteen-year-young boy surrounded by his elders: the Muscovite barons.

As she had done for the English many years ago, Angela found out that the original cornerstone of the One Church of All the Rus is not in relation to the Kremlin and that it must necessarily be headed by the Son of God whose spiritual Altar is in the heavenly Realm of Zion.

From Henry Tudor to Peter the Boy

Young sestra considers the claims advanced by Peter the boy as unfounded in the same manner as those presented some one hundred and fifty years earlier by Henry Tudor. And this puts the English and All the Rus in the position of being natural allies in the face of historical torts that have been imposed at institutional level in spiritual matters.

In fact both Henry VIII and Peter, and by extension those who followed them to one or the other throne, claimed to be the supreme authority over the spiritual through devious, violent or corrupt means. In both cases the rule of the temporal emperor was imposed over the Altar whereby the king (in England) or the emperor (in Russia) is the highest authority over the priests.

The Kyivan Faith

The research conducted by Angela into the Kyivan Faith is recent, starting earlier during this year and beginning with, as she described it, ‘a phone call to Greek Mother’ after her long-ongoing attempts at working respectively for the Italian and then the German cathedral and dome both failed miserably owing to British institutional interference. The British, worshipping their own monarch to the bitter end, claimed she never achieved anything and that her brother never even existed.

I have already noted that, after my sister subsequently took up contact with the spiritual Mother of the Ukrainian Child, my task was to carry out some investigations into how the Kyivan became deviated into the Muscovite, and in so doing to care for the needs of the Ukrainian Child. In obedience to this duty, my attention has been directed both at historical events and present day ones.

Indeed while there is plenty more to study about historical acts stemming from Constantinople’s attitude towards Kyiv’s ecclesia going back even long before the year 1685*, there are also issues relating to the dealings of the former No 10 Downing Street resident Boris Johnson who is desperately trying to get his choice of future US president into the White House with specific reference to Ukraine.

*Events that were most likely dictated not so much by the patriarchate in Constantinople but by the Byzantine emperor who was de facto the patriarch’s superior in spiritual matters.

An Ultimatum to Ukraine

In a very recent public statement, Boris Johnson, after travelling to Florida in the United States of America, revealed that he instructed the man he wants to propel into the Whitehouse on how to deal with Ukraine. The plan, he said, is to push Ukraine into surrendering parts of its territory to the Kremlin so that the Muscovy can rejoin the G8. He also announced that the person for whom he is acting as patron will ‘bring peace to the world’.

The statements coming from Boris Johnson in this respect are an invitation to Moscow to continue attacking Ukraine on the grounds that ‘no-one can do anything about it’ except one man once he becomes president. But were he to ascend to this post, Boris Johnson’s candidate will try sacrificing Ukraine and will do so with a vengeance, let’s say with one phone call and a 24 hour ultimatum, this being the message he’s been bringing over.

Black Sea Incident

What we need to ask ourselves is, what has Boris Johnson done? He in fact is the one who ignited the preparations for full-scale war by sending a British warship on a mission within Crimean waters in June 2021 with the declared intention of provoking Russia by disputing its annexation of the peninsula. Yet now he is insisting that the pre-February 2022 frontline boundaries, including those of annexed Crimea, should in fact remain under Moscow’s control.

So why did he send a warship there in the first place in 2021 to wind up the war rhetoric, seeing that in reality he wants Crimea and a part of Donbas to legally belong to Russia?

The logical next question is, what other territories do Boris Johnson and his candidate for the US presidency want to ‘legally’ hand over to the Kremlin?

And that leaves one more question: who is Boris Johnson really working for?

A uk-British Government Bond

Should the Moscovia decide to go for the ‘legal’ (this is in inverted commas) annexation of Ukraine using military means combined with international pressure from a man who claims he’ll bring ‘peace to the world’, it’s evident that in exchange Russia will return to the fold of the western elites running City banking.

City financial institutions, the European Union and the western companies offering expertise in the construction, maintenance and expansion of oil and gas facilities would be accepting Russia ‘back home in the West’, and a compliant and indebted Tsar who changed the Russian constitution multiple times in order to be in power ‘forever’ would walk away with the ultimate British Government Bond (the bonds circulated for aborting or sacrificing national Churches), signed by Winston Churchill II and his client in the Whitehouse – should he enter.

Clouds of black smoke leaving industrial chimneys heading to the sky, hard western currency flowing through the banking system by way of business-as-usual, the British East India Tea Company, self-satisfied EU commissars, a pet sitting in the eurozone eating peanuts …

The Price for Losing

Only, with the fall of Ukraine, the One Church of All the Rus would be sacrificed too, and the spiritual Mother of the Rus nations would be the loser. And so too would Srpska Majka lose along with the church Pokrova Presvete Bogorodice.

No sum of money and no price would ever get the Church back.

Here is today’s Party musical presentation.