Exposing Europe’s War Fantasies Aimed at England

Two world wars should have taught England a lesson: give Europe a miss this time!

A Note From the Transit Room

Script recently written on Party space in relation to England and Scotland shouldn’t be considered as if I were getting involved in matters relevant to the next government in London. I won’t be contacting any offices and my sole intention was to prevent the English and the Scots being forced into another catastrophic ‘victory over Europe’ enterprise like the one the British undertook in September 1939.

What I’ve been writing lately was simply considerations that are more likely to upend the fantasies other peoples’ governments have been getting involved in with the current British establishment.

The reason is, I know the English better than others think they know them, and regardless what many may have been assuming for years, I cannot see an English army marching out to fight for Europe in another world war. Thinking that being a NATO member and a member of the European Union will guarantee an English intervention for some other countries over whose decisions they had no part in, is a miscalculation.

As far as Europe is concerned, NATO and EU membership go arm in arm, the governments making decisions are exactly the same ones, they don’t have one face for NATO and another for the European Union. No, the face is exactly the same, only the mask changes!

Wasn’t Mother Russia on Britain’s Side?

One example of what recent Party posts are about is preventing the German government from forcing a nuclear strike policy onto the island of Britain while the Second Weimar Republic is dedicating all its efforts into sacrificing Germany for some eastern European EU states who don’t know how to look after themselves. They try bringing Germany down into the grave and England and Scotland along with them, and that while bleating: ‘You liberated our country by disembarking in Normandy, now you are obliged to liberate Europe from Mother Russia!” Bah humbug, go away!

It’s very probable the Hun will remind the English that Britain fought on the same side as Mother Russia and, lest they forgot, the Russians also celebrate the same victory day. That said, I don’t celebrate that victory and firmly believe the English will have realised the full extent to which the European Union and NATO are not worth dying for.

As for the spiritual Mother of All Rus, or Mother Rus, one hundred percent guaranteed the British didn’t get one inkling beforehand of the outstanding work Angela had wanted to commit herself too, not even a shadow of what it could have been about, and that’s how it’s going to remain!

Yet one question that comes to mind is: Why would Ukraine want to join NATO-the EU and die for Europe? It’s not worth it! I thought Ukraine, a Rus nation, bordered the Sea of Azov, not the German Ocean and the English Channel.

EU and NATO, a By-Product of D-DAY

The European Union and NATO are one and the same thing, they are both the inevitable outcome of landing in Normandy in June 1944, and the English have been there, done it, and later couldn’t get out of Europe quick enough. Twenty years of funding eastern Europe for free and having European laws forced onto them in the name of VE day and then going back and doing it all again? Nah!

England voted to leave the European Union, so if EU governments believe that decisions they make can be transferred into obligations by taking down one mask (the EU) and putting on another (NATO), to then foist these decisions onto England, they are truly mistaken.

A Nuclear Umbrella? Forget It!

When the current German chancellor, in the months before being inaugurated, was dreaming up notions about borrowing large sums of money in the form of public debt and investing it in Britain’s nuclear deterrence, it was configured as access to a nuclear umbrella that Britain has never extended to anyone, and it was intended to be on behalf of one or other EU-NATO country whose Trojan horse he was pulling along.

By his own words he not only gave proof that the CDU CSU electoral promise not to change the constitutional debt brake was manifestly false, he also presumed to have influence over the English and the Scots. He has no such influence!

In fact, when the European commissars and their friends in Westminster tried cancelling the EU leave or stay referendum and its democratic outcome in 2016 and the years following, they later understood it was better to let drop their tyrannical demands owing to very serious and unpredictable consequences that could have arisen – because the English were not going to give in to Europe.

The English had demanded a referendum, it had been promised them, it was understood as being binding, and no European bullying was going to take the leave result away from them. And now we see it: presumption, not influence!

How’s About Paying That Money Back Instead?

Still, following the exit-EU referendum, European governments did try crippling England’s economy with fictional leave penalties that had no substance in law, and it’s my opinion that one day this money could be demanded back along with the interest rather than an army departing from Dover headed to eastern Europe.

There is no lost love between England and Europe, and I can’t see English mothers helplessly accepting to cry tears for their sons who would be sent to the slaughter for the continental behemoth that the Commissariat created. To the contrary, they’ll undertake to prevent them leaving in the first place rather than fall for Europe’s crocodile tears. Again, many in Europe don’t understand the English, and this could have led some governments into a catastrophic underestimation of what they’re asking for.

Another point mentioned in previous Party pages was about the English demanding the declaration of a state of national emergency for the economy. I came to this conclusion because it’s the only logical way out of the current situation, regardless of any guff Boris Johnson might still have to offer.

England’s Birth Rate

Then we have the 1.5 birth rate: you’d think house prices and rent would go down, but instead they only increase. For many English people, finding a place to rent is not possible unless they are in receipt of benefits covering both rent and council tax.

So with the average child count being one point five or even less, and the available housing becoming more scarce and more unaffordable when the opposite should be true with a declining indigenous population, who can possibly believe that an English family will send their only son out to die for some distant land in eastern Europe? They won’t!

Would I go fight and die for some eastern European EU country? Hell no! So why would the English who have one and a half children to care for?

To Die for … What?

In the 7th June 2025 print The Drumbeat of War Getting Louder, mention was made of Europe’s unitary government preparing for war, renovating bunkers and increasing military spending to five percent of the national budget of each EU member state.

Whatever their motivations might be, going to war is a luxury, it requires a healthy birth rate, a public purse that isn’t in red and a dose of willingness, none of which is at Albion’s disposal. And therein lies my conclusion that in the EU’s eastern reaches they can sing to the birds if they think England will die for Europe. To die for your own country is hard enough, but dying for nothing?

Here’s today’s Party musical theme.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

За Русь Святую

Раз-Два-Три

Mädel’s Table Talk in a Wirtschaft in Bavaria

𝕯𝖎𝖊 𝖂𝖎𝖗𝖙𝖘𝖈𝖍𝖆𝖋𝖙 - The Restaurant

Germany and the Cult of Guilt

The Script for the Rhine Church

Hypnotising Germany by Thread and by Needle

The Castle on the Rhine

Germany’s Upcoming General Election

Vultures Waiting to Descend on Ukraine